A Quantitative Review of Urban Ecosystem Service Assessments: Concepts, Models, and Implementation

dc.contributor.author Nadja Kabisch
dc.contributor.author Peleg Kremer
dc.contributor.author Thomas Elmqvist
dc.contributor.author Timon McPhearson
dc.contributor.author Nina Schwarz
dc.contributor.author Salman Qureshi
dc.contributor.author Martina Artmann
dc.contributor.author Åsa Gren
dc.contributor.author Rieke Hansen
dc.contributor.author Johannes Langemeyer
dc.contributor.author Annette Voigt
dc.contributor.author Stephan Pauleit
dc.contributor.author Dagmar Haase
dc.contributor.author Jürgen Breuste
dc.contributor.author Nadja Kabisch
dc.contributor.author Emily Lorance Rall
dc.contributor.author Erik Andersson
dc.contributor.author Neele Larondelle
dc.contributor.author Sara Borgström
dc.contributor.author Daniel Wurster
dc.contributor.author Erik Gómez-Baggethun
dc.contributor.author Zoé A. Hamstead
dc.date.accessioned 2025-06-17T11:58:58Z
dc.date.available 2025-06-17T11:58:58Z
dc.date.issued 2014-04-17
dc.description.abstract Although a number of comprehensive reviews have examined global ecosystem services (ES), few have focused on studies that assess urban ecosystem services (UES). Given that more than half of the world's population lives in cities, understanding the dualism of the provision of and need for UES is of critical importance. Which UES are the focus of research, and what types of urban land use are examined? Are models or decision support systems used to assess the provision of UES? Are trade-offs considered? Do studies of UES engage stakeholders? To address these questions, we analyzed 217 papers derived from an ISI Web of Knowledge search using a set of standardized criteria. The results indicate that most UES studies have been undertaken in Europe, North America, and China, at city scale. Assessment methods involve bio-physical models, Geographical Information Systems, and valuation, but few study findings have been implemented as land use policy.
dc.description.epage 433
dc.description.spage 413
dc.description.volume 43
dc.identifier.doi 10.1007/s13280-014-0504-0
dc.identifier.issn 0044-7447
dc.identifier.issn 1654-7209
dc.identifier.openaire doi_dedup___:72ca479443f21bfe56885a58544d09b4
dc.identifier.pmc PMC3989520
dc.identifier.pmid 24740614
dc.identifier.uri https://ror.circle-u.eu/handle/123456789/721410
dc.openaire.affiliation Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
dc.openaire.collaboration 1
dc.publisher Springer Science and Business Media LLC
dc.rights OPEN
dc.rights.license CC BY
dc.source AMBIO
dc.subject Ecology
dc.subject Geography, Planning and Development
dc.subject Ecological and Environmental Phenomena
dc.subject Urban ecosystem services
dc.subject Review
dc.subject Models, Theoretical
dc.subject Policy implementation
dc.subject Article
dc.subject ITC-HYBRID
dc.subject ITC-ISI-JOURNAL-ARTICLE
dc.subject Demand-provisioning
dc.subject Environmental Chemistry
dc.subject Cities
dc.subject Ecosystem
dc.subject Model
dc.subject.fos 0211 other engineering and technologies
dc.subject.fos 02 engineering and technology
dc.subject.sdg 15. Life on land
dc.subject.sdg 11. Sustainability
dc.title A Quantitative Review of Urban Ecosystem Service Assessments: Concepts, Models, and Implementation
dc.type publication

Files

Collections