Sex-specific differences in the seasonal habitat use of a coastal dolphin population

dc.contributor.author Lars Bejder
dc.contributor.author Holly C. Raudino
dc.contributor.author Fredrik Christiansen
dc.contributor.author Halina T. Kobryn
dc.contributor.author Kate R. Sprogis
dc.contributor.author Lars Bejder
dc.contributor.author Randall S. Wells
dc.contributor.author Kate R. Sprogis
dc.date.accessioned 2025-06-17T19:07:22Z
dc.date.available 2025-06-17T19:07:22Z
dc.date.issued 2018-08-28
dc.description.abstract Understanding the factors that contribute to a population’s habitat use is important for conservation planners and managers to identify reasons behind a population’s distribution. Habitat use often differs between sexes, however few studies on sexually monomorphic species document this difference, resulting in misleading ecological interpretations and non-targeted management actions. The aim of this study was to test for sex-specific differences in the seasonal habitat use of Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops aduncus) off Bunbury, Australia. Systematic, boat-based, photographic identification dolphin surveys (n = 587) were conducted across seasons over 6 years during 2007–2013. Generalised additive models explored relationships between the presence-absence of dolphins and sex, water depth and benthic habitat type. Results highlighted that: (i) habitat use differed seasonally for males and females, (ii) depth had a strong influence on habitat use, which differed between sexes for summer, winter and spring, and (iii) there were no sex differences in habitat use in autumn, which coincides with the peak breeding season. In summer and autumn dolphins were concentrated in shallow, near-shore waters predominantly over reef and sand, and in winter and spring dolphins had a broader distribution over reef and mud/silt with the use of deeper, offshore waters. This pattern is consistent with the seasonally-dependent dolphin abundance that has been documented for this population. Identification of sex differences in habitat use provides management agencies with insights to implement informed actions for the conservation of this coastal dolphin population which is forecast to decline by 50% in the next two decades.
dc.description.epage 3656
dc.description.spage 3637
dc.description.volume 27
dc.identifier.doi 10.1007/s10531-018-1618-7
dc.identifier.issn 0960-3115
dc.identifier.issn 1572-9710
dc.identifier.openaire doi_dedup___:9469df10a18016647b78c84a538d8dc8
dc.identifier.uri https://ror.circle-u.eu/handle/123456789/861349
dc.openaire.affiliation Aarhus University
dc.openaire.collaboration 1
dc.publisher Springer Science and Business Media LLC
dc.rights RESTRICTED
dc.rights.license Springer TDM
dc.source Biodiversity and Conservation
dc.subject GROUP-SIZE
dc.subject LIFE-HISTORY
dc.subject BOTTLE-NOSED DOLPHINS
dc.subject Sexually monomorphic
dc.subject 590
dc.subject Generalised additive model
dc.subject SUITABILITY MODELS
dc.subject WESTERN-AUSTRALIA
dc.subject Western Australia
dc.subject Habitat model
dc.subject DISTRIBUTION MODELS
dc.subject WATERS
dc.subject 333
dc.subject TURSIOPS-TRUNCATUS
dc.subject Tursiops aduncus
dc.subject FORAGING HABITS
dc.subject Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphin
dc.subject SEGREGATION
dc.subject.fos 0106 biological sciences
dc.subject.fos 01 natural sciences
dc.subject.sdg 14. Life underwater
dc.subject.sdg 10. No inequality
dc.title Sex-specific differences in the seasonal habitat use of a coastal dolphin population
dc.type publication

Files

Collections